Current:Home > FinanceJudge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward -Wealth Evolution Experts
Judge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward
View
Date:2025-04-13 11:41:21
An Idaho judge on Friday denied a request by the state’s top legal chief to throw out a lawsuit seeking to clarify the exemptions tucked inside the state’s broad abortion ban.
Instead, 4th District Judge Jason Scott narrowed the case to focus only on the circumstances where an abortion would be allowed and whether abortion care in emergency situations applies to Idaho’s state constitutional right to enjoy and defend life and the right to secure safety.
Scott’s decision comes just two weeks after a hearing where Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador’s office attempted to dismiss the case spearheaded by four women and several physicians, who filed the case earlier this year.
Similar lawsuits are playing out around the nation, with some of them, like Idaho’s, brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of doctors and pregnant people who were denied access to abortions while facing serious pregnancy complications.
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, Idaho’s Constitution entitles its residents to certain fundamental rights, but a sweeping abortion ban poses a risk to those rights.
Labrador’s office countered that the Idaho Supreme Court has already upheld the state’s abortion bans — thus solving any lingering questions on the matter.
Scott agreed in part with the state attorneys that the state Supreme Court ruled there was no fundamental right to abortion inside the state constitution, but added that the court didn’t reject “every conceivable as applied challenge that might be made in a future case.”
“We’re grateful the court saw through the state’s callous attempt to ignore the pain and suffering their laws are causing Idahoans,” said Gail Deady, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Now the state of Idaho will be forced to answer to these women in a court of law.”
Meanwhile, the Idaho judge also sided with the attorney general in removing Gov. Brad Little, Labrador, and the Idaho Board of Medicine as named defendants in the lawsuit — leaving the state of Idaho as the only remaining defendant. Scott called the long list of defendants as “redundant,” saying that all three would be subject to whatever is ultimately decided in the lawsuit.
“This is only the beginning of this litigation, but the Attorney General is encouraged by this ruling,” Labrador’s office said in a statement. “He has long held that the named defendants were simply inappropriate, and that our legislatively passed laws do not violate the Idaho Constitution by narrowly limiting abortions or interfering with a doctor’s right to practice medicine.”
The four women named in the case were all denied abortions in Idaho after learning they were pregnant with fetuses that were unlikely to go to term or survive birth, and that the pregnancies also put them at risk of serious medical complications. All four traveled to Oregon or Washington for the procedures.
Idaho has several abortion bans, but notably Idaho lawmakers approved a ban as a trigger law in March of 2020, before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
At the time, any suggestion that the ban could harm pregnant people was quickly brushed off by the bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Todd Lakey, who said during one debate that the health of the mother “weighs less, yes, than the life of the child.”
The trigger ban took effect in 2022. Since then, Idaho’s roster of obstetricians and other pregnancy-related specialists has been shrinking.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Two states' top election officials talk about threats arising from election denialism — on The Takeout
- Proposed mine outside Georgia’s Okefenokee Swamp nears approval despite environment damage concerns
- Elon Musk’s Neuralink moves legal home to Nevada after Delaware judge invalidates his Tesla pay deal
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- ADHD affects a lot of us. Here's what causes it.
- People mocked AirPods and marveled at Segways, where will Apple's Vision Pro end up?
- Alicia Silverstone Just Channeled Her Clueless Character With This Red-Hot Look
- FBI: California woman brought sword, whip and other weapons into Capitol during Jan. 6 riot
- 200-foot radio station tower stolen without a trace in Alabama, silencing small town’s voice
Ranking
- Former Milwaukee hotel workers charged with murder after video shows them holding down Black man
- Usher reveals the most 'personal' song on new album: 'Oh, I'm ruined'
- Senate slowly forges ahead on foreign aid bill
- Is Caitlin Clark the best player ... ever? Five questions about Iowa's transcendent guard
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Drug possession charge against rapper Kodak Black dismissed in Florida
- 2 deputies shot, 1 killed at traffic stop in Blount County, Tennessee, manhunt underway
- People mocked AirPods and marveled at Segways, where will Apple's Vision Pro end up?
Recommendation
DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
Microsoft's Super Bowl message: We're an AI company now
Tennessee knocks North Carolina from No. 1 seed in the men's tournament Bracketology
Military names 5 Marines killed in helicopter crash in California mountains. All were in their 20s.
Golf's No. 1 Nelly Korda looking to regain her form – and her spot on the Olympic podium
How King Charles and Kate Middleton’s Health Challenges Are Already Changing the Royal Family
For Native American activists, the Kansas City Chiefs have it all wrong
Deion Sanders adds NFL heft to coaching staff at Colorado