Current:Home > MarketsEPA sets first ever limits on toxic PFAS, or 'forever chemicals,' in drinking water -Wealth Evolution Experts
EPA sets first ever limits on toxic PFAS, or 'forever chemicals,' in drinking water
View
Date:2025-04-13 20:17:59
The Environmental Protection Agency imposed the first federal limits on PFAS, or "forever chemicals," in drinking water, allowing the government to enforce limits on the levels of toxic chemicals linked to cancer and other health risks in public water systems across the country.
PFAS, or per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a class of nearly indestructible chemicals found in a wide range of items, such as non-stick pans, firefighting foam, microwave popcorn packaging and other water-repellent products.
The new rules will mandate that public water systems monitor and inform the public of levels of PFAS in drinking water. Up to 10% of the 66,000 water systems that the new rule applies to may need to reduce the PFAS levels in their water, according to the EPA.
Under the new regulations, water systems will have three years to complete an initial test for current levels of PFAS in their water supply. If the levels are too high, they must reduce them within five years.
"This new standard will reduce PFAS exposure for approximately 100 million people," EPA Administrator Michael Regan said at a press briefing on Wednesday.
The EPA first proposed limits to the same six types of PFAS last March.
Under the new limits, the agency will cap levels of PFOA and PFOS, two of the most widely used types of PFAS, in drinking water, at 4 parts per trillion, the lowest level that most labs can detect the chemicals in water. The EPA set a goal of eliminating the two chemicals from water levels entirely.
"They're the ones that probably have the most proven health harm that we've studied," Ariana Spentzos, science and policy associate at the Green Science Policy Institute, said of the two chemicals. Setting zero as "the goal level really is acknowledging that there's no safe level for those particular chemicals," she added.
The new rules cap limits of other PFAS chemicals, including PFNA, PFHxS, and "GenX Chemicals," at a slightly higher level of 10 parts per trillion. Those same chemicals, along with PFBS, are also limited when they are mixed together.
Courtney Carignan, an assistant professor at Michigan State University and member of the university's Center for PFAS Research, said "PFHxS is excreted from the body the most slowly" and could take eight years or more to exit the body, compared with PFOA and PFAS, which take about 3 to 5 years.
The Biden administration also said it would set aside $1 billion of funding authorized by the infrastructure law passed in Nov. 2021 to go towards testing and treatment of public water systems and helping owners of private wells address PFAS contamination.
Data released by the EPA last month from an ongoing five-year review of water systems across the country showed at least 70 million Americans get their water from systems with high enough levels of PFAS to require reporting to the agency, according to a USA TODAY investigation.
Out of about 3,800 water systems reviewed, 1,245 contained levels of at least one of the toxic chemicals mandating reporting. Those included systems in large urban areas like Salt Lake City, Sacramento, California, Madison, Wisconsin and Louisville, Kentucky, according to the data.
Eleven states have imposed their own regulations on PFAS, and Delaware and Virginia are in the process of passing regulations.
Spentzos said efforts to regulate PFAS only accelerated recently, even though there have been warning signs about their safety for decades. "Things have really picked up in the last five to 10 years, but the harms of this have been known for a long time."
More:EPA detected "forever chemicals" in water systems serving 46 million. Is yours on our map?
'Long, growing list' of negative health effects of PFAS
PFAS can seep into the ground around factories and plants where they are used and end up in nearby water supplies, said Carignan.
"They're also extremely mobile and they can travel with the water cycle," Carignan said. "This is one of the properties that's made them problematic, along with the fact that they've been found to be toxic."
Some PFAS have been found to have negative effects on multiple systems of the body, even at relatively low levels in drinking water, Carignan said.
Research has linked PFAS with certain diseases, including kidney, testicular and breast cancer, Carignan said. It can also affect fetal development. Some types of PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS, can also decrease the body's immune response, leaving it more vulnerable to disease.
"There's some studies showing effects possibly on the brain and neurodevelopment," as well as bone density, Carignan said. "It is sort of this long, growing list."
Cybele Mayes-Osterman is a breaking news reporter for USA Today. Reach her on email at cmayesosterman@usatoday.com. Follow her on X @CybeleMO.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- The list of nominations for 2023 Oscars
- US heat wave stretches into Midwest, heading for Northeast: Latest forecast
- It's easy to focus on what's bad — 'All That Breathes' celebrates the good
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- New Mexico prosecutors downgrade charges against Alec Baldwin in the 'Rust' shooting
- 'Wait Wait' for Jan. 28, 2023: With Not My Job guest Natasha Lyonne
- See all the red carpet looks from the 2023 Oscars
- British golfer Charley Hull blames injury, not lack of cigarettes, for poor Olympic start
- Oscar nominee Michelle Yeoh shines in 'Everything Everywhere All At Once'
Ranking
- American news website Axios laying off dozens of employees
- What happens when a director's camera is pointed at their own families?
- The New Black Film Canon is your starting point for great Black filmmaking
- 2023 marks a watershed year for Asian performers at the Oscars
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- See all the red carpet looks from the 2023 Oscars
- A rarely revived Lorraine Hansberry play is here — and it's messy but powerful
- A project collects the names of those held at Japanese internment camps during WWII
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
'The Daily Show' guest hosts (so far): Why Leslie Jones soared and D.L. Hughley sank
Musician Steven Van Zandt gifts Jamie Raskin a bandana, wishes him a 'rapid' recovery
The U.S. faces 'unprecedented uncertainty' regarding abortion law, legal scholar says
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
The New Black Film Canon is your starting point for great Black filmmaking
60 dancers who fled the war now take the stage — as The United Ukrainian Ballet
'Wait Wait' for Feb. 4, 2023: With Not My Job guest Billy Porter